Timeline for Construction of the petit Zariski topos out of the gros topos of a scheme
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2010 at 15:37 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I was able to find her thesis in one of the usual places =). | |
| Apr 16, 2010 at 15:24 | comment | added | Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen | See for example in section IV.5 of her thesis. A good account on what it says about the étale spectrum can be found here: springerlink.com/content/10x9002103602132/fulltext.pdf | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 10:13 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Where in M. Hakim's thesis? | |
| Apr 13, 2010 at 10:12 | history | undeleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Apr 13, 2010 at 10:11 | history | deleted | Harry Gindi | ||
| Apr 13, 2010 at 9:11 | comment | added | Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen | Harry, thanks for your answer. However, it is not the answer I was looking for. It is clear that one can construct the petit (étale) topos out of the gros (étale) topos and that the ring object can be constructed the way you described it. But the question was whether this construction can be viewed as a natural one or whether the geometric morphisms between the gros and the petit toposes fulfill some universal properties. (For example, if I am not mistaken, constructing the petit étale topos out of the petit Zariski topos has a nice description; see M. Hakim's thesis.) Marc | |
| Apr 12, 2010 at 20:49 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 7 characters in body; edited body
|
| Apr 12, 2010 at 20:30 | history | answered | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |