Skip to main content
fixed LaTeX
Source Link
Todd Trimble
  • 53.3k
  • 6
  • 205
  • 322

For a general theory, one does not need to have $lambda$$\lambda$-directed colimits for any $\lambda$. The simpliest example is formed by sets and the axiom $(\exists x,y)(x\neq y)$(\exists x,y)(x\neq y)$; idempotents do not split here.

For a general theory, one does not need to have $lambda$-directed colimits for any $\lambda$. The simpliest example is formed by sets and the axiom $(\exists x,y)(x\neq y); idempotents do not split here.

For a general theory, one does not need to have $\lambda$-directed colimits for any $\lambda$. The simpliest example is formed by sets and the axiom $(\exists x,y)(x\neq y)$; idempotents do not split here.

Source Link
Jiří Rosický
  • 2.2k
  • 1
  • 17
  • 16

For a general theory, one does not need to have $lambda$-directed colimits for any $\lambda$. The simpliest example is formed by sets and the axiom $(\exists x,y)(x\neq y); idempotents do not split here.