Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2015 at 8:29 comment added Sebastian Dear QIAOJIAXIN, your question is not research level, and you should be able to extract the answer from any differential geometry book dealing with the Frobenius theorem, e.g. Lee's "Manifolds and Differential Geometry".
Jul 10, 2015 at 8:24 comment added Sebastian Dear Dimitri, I think this is not only too complicated, but also circular in the following sense: In order to prove Theorem 4.4. and Lemma 4.5 you have (at some point) to prove a (stronger) version of the assertion, see for example Proposition 3.8 in the mentioned paper.
Jul 9, 2015 at 9:40 vote accept QIAOJIAXIN
Jul 9, 2015 at 9:36 vote accept QIAOJIAXIN
Jul 9, 2015 at 9:40
Jul 8, 2015 at 16:31 history closed Alex Degtyarev
Yoav Kallus
Johannes Hahn
Stefan Kohl
abx
Not suitable for this site
Jul 8, 2015 at 16:09 answer added Compactness timeline score: 1
Jul 8, 2015 at 16:06 comment added Dmitri Pavlov This follows immediately from the nonabelian Stokes theorem, see Theorem 4.4 and Lemma 4.5 in Schreiber and Waldorf's “Smooth functors vs. differential forms” (dx.doi.org/10.4310/HHA.2011.v13.n1.a7).
Jul 8, 2015 at 14:25 review Close votes
Jul 8, 2015 at 16:31
Jul 8, 2015 at 14:15 review Low quality posts
Jul 8, 2015 at 15:56
Jul 8, 2015 at 14:03 review First posts
Jul 8, 2015 at 14:08
Jul 8, 2015 at 14:00 history asked QIAOJIAXIN CC BY-SA 3.0