Timeline for Moore spectra are not E-infinity (oldest known proof)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jul 2, 2015 at 18:40 | comment | added | user51223 | I think I have been a little vague here, so what follows might be vague too, and maybe wonrg!! Often, you start with a Moore space and then attach cells to get an EM space. So, somehow reverse, if we can think off a Moore space as the $\infty$-stage of Postnikov system for an EM space, then you see that in their Kraines-Lada paper, what they do is to consider spaces of different stages in a Postnikov system built over an EM space and show that these spaces cannot have $A_k$ structure, so on. So, if you feel happy reading their paper in this way, I thought it would imply what you are after. | |
| Jul 2, 2015 at 0:25 | comment | added | Prasit | If you don't mind, can you point me out to some of the details of this paper that are relevant to the question above? May be a sketch! | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 9:34 | comment | added | user51223 | I suggest the paper of Kraines and Lada on the transfer conjecture, titled `A Counterexample to the Transfer Conjecture'. I don't think it is stated as a statement you quote above, but their result on a 3-stage Postnikov tower of an Eilenberg MacLane space, I guess, implies the statement you look for. | |
| Jun 30, 2015 at 22:15 | history | edited | Prasit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body; edited title
|
| Jun 30, 2015 at 21:50 | history | asked | Prasit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |