Timeline for Looking for an effective irrationality measure of $\pi$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 11, 2017 at 21:56 | comment | added | Jaume Oliver Lafont | Salikhov's paper is available here: mathnet.ru/links/93c99ab6587bdc1bf0912ec96b1d9f4f/rm9175.pdf | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 18:08 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 6, 2015 at 19:03 | comment | added | Zachary W. Robertson | I wasn't aware this was migrated, I'll delete my answer in that case. | |
| Jun 30, 2015 at 19:59 | history | migrated | from math.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Jun 7, 2015 at 18:51 | comment | added | Piquito | The exponent -42 got by Mahler was quite extraordinary in his time ("Striking inequality", Alan Baker). It is valid for all rational p/q with q > 1 and also indicates that rationals "may not be very closed to $\pi$". I guess all improvement of the exponent -42 is valid just "for all sufficiently large q" in the ordinary meaning of this expression without explicity giving of bounds. Maybe possible but certainly quite difficult to get them. | |
| Jun 7, 2015 at 18:04 | comment | added | Micah | @muaddib: Nope, you must be thinking of some other Micah... | |
| Jun 7, 2015 at 18:03 | comment | added | muaddib | I know this is random but by any chance did you go to New College? | |
| Jun 7, 2015 at 18:02 | history | asked | Micah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |