Timeline for Counting matrices of special types
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 25, 2019 at 17:32 | answer | added | Ira Gessel | timeline score: 4 | |
Jul 5, 2015 at 3:19 | vote | accept | Turbo | ||
Jul 5, 2015 at 3:19 | vote | accept | Turbo | ||
Jul 5, 2015 at 3:19 | |||||
Jul 1, 2015 at 7:16 | comment | added | Gordon Royle | For small $n$, I get the numbers of symmetric ones to be $4$, $44$, $716$, $24416$, which is a sequence not in the OEIS, nor are its obvious transforms (i.e. divide by 2 since we can swap 0/1). [Not sure why the question has 2 votes to close, as it seems perfectly reasonable to me.] | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:55 | answer | added | Max Alekseyev | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:47 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 30, 2015 at 11:22 | |||||
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:42 | history | undeleted | Turbo | ||
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:39 | history | deleted | Turbo | via Vote | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:33 | history | edited | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 218 characters in body
|
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:31 | history | undeleted | Turbo | ||
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:31 | history | deleted | Turbo | via Vote | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:23 | comment | added | Brendan McKay | It's a good idea to look up OEIS first. A088310 | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:18 | history | edited | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 76 characters in body
|
Jun 29, 2015 at 10:44 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 29, 2015 at 13:42 | |||||
Jun 29, 2015 at 10:01 | history | asked | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |