Timeline for Maximum of the Vandermonde determinant / minimum of the logarithmic energy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 30, 2015 at 22:01 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 338 characters in body
|
Jun 30, 2015 at 21:57 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Of course, they are the same; sorry for having been too hasty, and thank you for your comment. I have now edited my answer accordingly. | |
Jun 30, 2015 at 18:45 | comment | added | ofer zeitouni | The two forms of Selberg's formula are the same (the form I wrote is from Anderson's proof, which is reproduced in our RMT book with Guionnet; but with some effort, using the n!, you can check they are the same formula). There is a very nice review of Selberg's formula by Forrester, which is highly recommended and entertaining reading. See ams.org/journals/bull/2008-45-04/S0273-0979-08-01221-4/… | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 3:58 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Added a remark that in general the discrete logarithmic energy $2E_{n,a}$ cannot be approximated by its ostensibly more general counterpart $n^2 E_\mu$, for any probability measure $\mu$ on $[0,1]$. | |
Jun 29, 2015 at 3:56 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a remark that in general the discrete logarithmic energy $2E_{n,a}$ cannot be approximated by its ostensibly more general counterpart $n^2 E_\mu$, for any probability measure $\mu$ on $[0,1]$.
|
Jun 28, 2015 at 20:03 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jun 28, 2015 at 18:01 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |