Timeline for Maximum of the Vandermonde determinant / minimum of the logarithmic energy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 30, 2015 at 16:37 | vote | accept | Iosif Pinelis | ||
| Jun 29, 2015 at 6:20 | answer | added | Denis Serre | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 28, 2015 at 18:43 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Sergei: I don't see how the AGM inequality could be useful here. It works well when the terms are close to one another. But this is not the (extremal) case here, even if you rewrite the differences $a_j-a_i$ as the sums of some of the $h_k$'s, where $h_k:=a_k-a_{k-1}$. | |
| Jun 28, 2015 at 18:01 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 28, 2015 at 9:05 | comment | added | Sergei | The AGM inequality gives an upper bound with sum instead of the product. Are there a close form for this sum? By all means many terms in this sum are cancelled, is not it possible to find the close form for the rest? | |
| Jun 26, 2015 at 22:16 | answer | added | Noam D. Elkies | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 26, 2015 at 19:01 | history | edited | Ricardo Andrade |
replaced new tags with well-established ones
|
|
| Jun 26, 2015 at 18:41 | answer | added | ofer zeitouni | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jun 26, 2015 at 17:37 | history | asked | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |