Timeline for Volume-minimizing submanifold implies calibrated?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 at 14:38 | answer | added | Zhenhua Liu | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 5, 2016 at 1:55 | comment | added | zzz | Michael Freedman answered his own question in a 1604.1604.00354 where it looks like the claim is that this holds for $p = d-1$. | |
| Jun 29, 2015 at 13:39 | answer | added | alvarezpaiva | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 25, 2015 at 15:14 | comment | added | Robert Bryant | @Rbega: As far as I know, this is an open question even when one assumes that $M$ is compact and the Jacobi operator (which controls the second variation) has strictly positive eigenvalues. | |
| Jun 25, 2015 at 4:50 | history | edited | Michael Freedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added answer to a question
|
| Jun 24, 2015 at 19:25 | comment | added | Rbega | Do you know if you can construct the calibration locally -- i.e. in a regular tubular neighborhood of the submanifold? | |
| Jun 24, 2015 at 14:46 | history | edited | Michael Freedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Robert Bryan pointed out that there are easy "no" answers unless one takes multiplicities into account.
|
| Jun 24, 2015 at 13:46 | answer | added | Robert Bryant | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 24, 2015 at 7:05 | history | edited | Marco Golla | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited formatting and added a link
|
| Jun 24, 2015 at 4:10 | history | asked | Michael Freedman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |