Timeline for Which topological properties are preserved under taking box products?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 8, 2019 at 1:50 | review | Close votes | |||
Apr 8, 2019 at 13:02 | |||||
Feb 16, 2019 at 18:16 | vote | accept | Joseph Van Name | ||
Jan 2, 2019 at 18:10 | comment | added | Gro-Tsen | Related question: mathoverflow.net/questions/319920/homotopy-type-of-box-topology | |
Nov 10, 2017 at 12:52 | answer | added | Taras Banakh | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 10, 2017 at 7:09 | answer | added | Santi Spadaro | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 22, 2015 at 8:44 | answer | added | Dominic van der Zypen | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 7:34 | answer | added | Dominic van der Zypen | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 7:22 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | (I was wondering whether meta-compactness might be an exception to your 'negative' list of other compactness properties.) | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 7:20 | answer | added | Dominic van der Zypen | timeline score: -2 | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 4:24 | comment | added | KConrad | That's a better version. | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 3:17 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | @KConrad: I took a shot at writing it out in prose. | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 3:16 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
less logical symbology
|
Jun 19, 2015 at 1:50 | comment | added | KConrad | The notation $\models$ is not widely known among people who haven't studied mathematical logic. (I had to look at the code of your question, as if I were to edit it, to know how to typeset it.) Would you consider rewriting the last paragraph so it is understandable to those without familiarity with that notation by writing the question in plain English? | |
Jun 19, 2015 at 0:56 | history | asked | Joseph Van Name | CC BY-SA 3.0 |