Timeline for A possible trace (inequality) defined under negative Sobolev scale
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 at 13:59 | answer | added | Denis Serre | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Apr 19, 2019 at 12:54 | history | suggested | Skeeve | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected a typo in the notation of Sobolev space (and some other typos)
|
| Apr 19, 2019 at 11:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 19, 2019 at 12:54 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2019 at 11:33 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
title , no stupid question
|
| Apr 19, 2019 at 11:05 | answer | added | Kweku A | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 16:45 | comment | added | Johannes Hahn | You could just use $C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$ oder $C_c^\infty(\mathbb{R}^n)$ as a test function space. | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 16:27 | answer | added | BLM | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jun 21, 2015 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 21, 2015 at 9:09 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2015 at 10:20 | comment | added | mediocre | Thank you very much for your comments. You are right indeed that if we choose this particular space, the Neumann derivative shall be zero, but can we choose any other testing space instead which might legitimize the definition? | |
| Jun 16, 2015 at 10:58 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 12:28 | |||||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 10:29 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | The problem is that if you pick $f\in H_0^{s+2}$, then $\partial f/\partial\nu$ will be zero on the boundary. | |
| S Jun 16, 2015 at 5:00 | history | suggested | Duchamp Gérard H. E. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected spelling of the name Sobolev
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 4:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 16, 2015 at 5:00 | |||||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 4:37 | history | edited | mediocre |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 16, 2015 at 4:31 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 5:09 | |||||
| Jun 16, 2015 at 4:31 | history | asked | mediocre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |