Timeline for $\Omega X$-action on spectral $X$-bundles
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 22, 2015 at 20:10 | vote | accept | Jonathan Beardsley | ||
Jun 17, 2015 at 20:14 | history | edited | Jonathan Beardsley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
Jun 16, 2015 at 14:04 | comment | added | Sean Tilson | @QiaochuYuan It feels a bit like you are addressing the obvious part and not the interesting part of the question. I think Jon is aware of what you are saying, but I could be wrong. Heaven knows it has happened before. | |
Jun 16, 2015 at 3:11 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | @Jon: the data of an action of a grouplike $E_1$ space $G$ on an object of an $\infty$-category $C$ is precisely the data of a functor $BG \to C$. So the data of a functor $X \to C$ is precisely the data of a functor $B \Omega X \to C$, which is in turn precisely the data of an $\Omega X$-action on an object of $C$. | |
Jun 16, 2015 at 1:40 | comment | added | Jonathan Beardsley | @QiaochuYuan that comment is not helpful at all. Obviously I understand that $X\simeq B\Omega X$. If I knew why that implied what I'm describing above, I wouldn't have asked the question. | |
Jun 14, 2015 at 21:21 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | $X$ needs to be a based and connected space. | |
Jun 14, 2015 at 16:36 | comment | added | Tom Goodwillie | I think that the first occurrence of $X$ in the second paragraph was meant to be $\Omega X$. | |
Jun 14, 2015 at 16:13 | answer | added | John Klein | timeline score: 9 | |
Jun 14, 2015 at 15:42 | history | asked | Jonathan Beardsley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |