Timeline for Are there infinitely many zeros of $\chi(s)+ \dfrac{2^{s}- 2^{2s-1}}{2^{s}-1}$ on the critical line?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
May 1, 2016 at 6:28 | comment | added | user90369 | Not the above equation seems to be interesting, but its behavior. I mean: There are infinitely many functions with a similar behavior ( most astonishing is the constantly recurring maximum, it is actually 2 ? ). It would make sense to look for functions where the problematic gamma function has disappeared, so that the real part of all zeros is \frac{1}{2} . Does such an equation exist ? (I don't know) | |
Jun 12, 2015 at 14:04 | history | edited | Agno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed an error (mixed up N and the prime number $P_N$ in the graph explanation).
|
Jun 12, 2015 at 12:58 | history | edited | Agno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a graph of the zeros to better illustrate the point.
|
Jun 12, 2015 at 7:47 | comment | added | Agno | Zeraoulia, the subtle difference is that this equation builds up the prime distribution 'prime by prime' and each incremental prime added to the product keeps inducing zeros at (I conjecture) $\Re(s)=\frac12$. It seems to also work for any finite integer product in this equation (with the imaginary parts then obviously uncorrelated to the $\rho$s, but the $\Re(s)$ still at $\frac12$). | |
Jun 11, 2015 at 23:34 | comment | added | zeraoulia rafik | :This problem is nifty looking and it's the same with RH (Always the same gaol "problem of primes distribution ) | |
Jun 11, 2015 at 22:42 | history | asked | Agno | CC BY-SA 3.0 |