Timeline for Do the support sets of subspaces give the representable matroids?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2017 at 20:02 | comment | added | Tobias Fritz | Something's wrong here, if I interpret 'the above fact does hold over any field' as claiming that for any subspace $V\subseteq F^n$, the set of supports of nonzero vectors in $V$ forms the dependent sets of a matroid. The obvious counterexample is the space of vectors of even parity in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$, for which the set of supports is not upwards closed. So what exactly is the correct statement? | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 23:43 | answer | added | Ben Webster♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 22:53 | history | edited | Louis Deaett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 13 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jun 11, 2015 at 22:44 | history | edited | Louis Deaett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 371 characters in body
|
| Jun 11, 2015 at 22:29 | history | asked | Louis Deaett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |