Timeline for Generalizing the commutator and anti-commutator
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015 at 16:59 | comment | added | Christopher Drupieski | Of course, there is the "associator" $[x,y,z]:=(xy)z-x(yz)$, which is identically zero if and only if the ambient algebra is associative. | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 16:53 | vote | accept | Alan | ||
| Jun 11, 2015 at 16:20 | comment | added | YCor | @arsmath I usually first ask and then edit only if the author doesn't react. Also I expected the author to add the setting (associative rings...) (For cleaning I'll erase this comment, please do the same with yours.) | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 15:46 | history | edited | arsmath | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix typos
|
| Jun 11, 2015 at 15:20 | answer | added | The Masked Avenger | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 14:48 | comment | added | Joonas Ilmavirta | A little remark: Your $[A,B,C]$ is invariant under cyclic permutations by definition and $[A,B,C]+[B,A,C]=0$ is the Jacobi identity. | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 14:45 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jun 11, 2015 at 14:19 | history | asked | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |