Timeline for Stein Manifolds and Affine Varieties
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2014 at 14:10 | comment | added | David E Speyer | Goodman and Hartshorne must have an implicit assumption that $X$ is separated, the result as stated is false for the line with doubled origin. (Of course, Stein implies separated, so your main answer is fine.) | |
| Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15 | comment | added | Allen Knutson | Answering this way (rather than in person) means more people get to see it! | |
| Nov 12, 2009 at 16:23 | history | edited | Tony Pantev | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2009 at 14:09 | vote | accept | Charles Siegel | ||
| Oct 23, 2009 at 13:43 | history | answered | Tony Pantev | CC BY-SA 2.5 |