Timeline for Formal-group interpretation for Lin's theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2010 at 17:15 | answer | added | Charles Rezk | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 10, 2010 at 3:01 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | Ach, you're correct, I was thinking of the Ext-term they calculate in the course of the proof. Mao's thesis I had to request by interlibrary loan - he left mathematics before publishing. | |
| Apr 9, 2010 at 22:15 | comment | added | Charles Rezk | Is there an account of Mao's thesis available anywhere? It doesn't look like it got published. | |
| Apr 9, 2010 at 21:54 | comment | added | Charles Rezk | I think you mean that Lin's theorem says that $Ext(Z/2[x^\pm],Z/2)$ is the same as $Ext(Z/2,Z/2)$ (up to a shift), not that it degenerates to a single non-zero group. | |
| Apr 9, 2010 at 20:22 | history | asked | Tyler Lawson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |