Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 20, 2023 at 11:41 answer added Stefan Kohl timeline score: 3
Jul 19, 2016 at 6:53 answer added Glasby timeline score: 3
Apr 11, 2010 at 9:25 vote accept Colin Reid
Apr 11, 2010 at 9:24 comment added Colin Reid I agree that it's a very interesting feature of finite simple groups that their outer automorphism groups are so small, and the 'exceptional' automorphisms are also interesting. What I meant was that if one is proving some general and fairly crude statement about finite groups, it's often not very enlightening for the reader to see a classification trawl in the proof, especially if it is one that has been repeated several times in the existing literature.
Apr 9, 2010 at 19:22 answer added Ievgen Bondarenko timeline score: 15
Apr 9, 2010 at 18:20 comment added Jim Humphreys One person's "tedious" is another person's "fascinating". Much of the appeal in the classification of finite simple groups lies in the individuality of the groups which mysteriously appear in this list.
Apr 9, 2010 at 14:31 answer added Jack Schmidt timeline score: 10
Apr 9, 2010 at 14:27 answer added S. Carnahan timeline score: 11
Apr 9, 2010 at 12:47 history asked Colin Reid CC BY-SA 2.5