Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 25, 2015 at 19:25 comment added Suvrit Ok, that clarifies my doubts. Before plowing into this, however, I'd like to ask you do you have any numerical evidence that suggests that your conjecture may hold? Thanks!
May 25, 2015 at 18:01 comment added Sasho Nikolov For example, the simplest $i=j=1$ case of my question reduced to the inequality $D(A, B', C_3, \ldots, C_n)/2 + D(A',B, C_3, \ldots, C_n)/2 \ge \sqrt{D(A, B, C_3, \ldots, C_n)D(A',B',C_3, \ldots, C_n)}$. I dont see how to connect this to concavity of the mixed discriminant on the discrete simplex.
May 25, 2015 at 17:55 comment added Sasho Nikolov @Suvrit Gardner's Bulletin paper is indeed a great resource. The other paper you link to talks about a different concavity question that goes back to Gromov. They fix $n$ bodies and look at mixed volume as a function on the discrete simplex $\{x \in \mathbb{Z}_+^n: \sum x_i = n\}$, and ask if the function is log concave. Aleksandrov-Fenchel says that it is log-concave on particular segments, and this turns out to be equivalent to generalized Brunn-Minkowski. However, I don't see a similar connection between the concavity of my function $h$ and concavity on the discrete simplex.
May 25, 2015 at 14:38 comment added Suvrit The closest paper I found relevant to your question is: arxiv.org/pdf/1412.8200.pdf --- does Corollary 4.1 in there help?
May 25, 2015 at 14:27 comment added Suvrit The discussion on pg. 391 of ams.org/journals/bull/2002-39-03/S0273-0979-02-00941-2/… seems to contain useful pointers; the conjecture seems nice but probably it breaks.
May 25, 2015 at 9:11 history edited Sasho Nikolov CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 39 characters in body
May 25, 2015 at 5:19 history edited Sasho Nikolov CC BY-SA 3.0
added 7 characters in body
May 25, 2015 at 2:07 history edited Sasho Nikolov CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
May 25, 2015 at 1:52 history asked Sasho Nikolov CC BY-SA 3.0