Timeline for Boundedness of solutions of a difference equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2015 at 21:30 | vote | accept | salimmath15 | ||
| Jul 31, 2015 at 15:17 | answer | added | zeraoulia rafik | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 15, 2015 at 17:51 | vote | accept | salimmath15 | ||
| Jul 31, 2015 at 21:28 | |||||
| S Jun 15, 2015 at 17:48 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Jun 15, 2015 at 17:48 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Jun 8, 2015 at 15:33 | answer | added | Iosif Pinelis | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Jun 7, 2015 at 16:44 | history | bounty started | salimmath15 | ||
| S Jun 7, 2015 at 16:44 | history | notice added | salimmath15 | Draw attention | |
| May 30, 2015 at 13:01 | comment | added | GH from MO | @rafik: Thanks, I deleted my answer now. | |
| May 30, 2015 at 12:57 | comment | added | salimmath15 | @GHfromMO, i knew this that's published conjecture after positing it , in the fisrt it was my independent work | |
| May 30, 2015 at 12:45 | comment | added | salimmath15 | @GHfromMO you can edit your answer | |
| May 30, 2015 at 8:14 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed to a useful title. Added reference from the comments.
|
| May 30, 2015 at 3:43 | history | edited | Arturo Magidin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
As long as there was a recent bump, let's get rid of all those nasty typos, the annoying "how to proof", etc.
|
| May 30, 2015 at 2:39 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 30, 2015 at 11:47 | |||||
| May 30, 2015 at 1:47 | comment | added | GH from MO | As @RobertIsrael pointed out to me, the problem asked above is Conjecture 8 in the paper anubih.ba/Journals/vol.8,no-2,y12/11Ladas-Lugo-Palladino.pdf . My answer below was accepted by the OP, but unfortunately it answered a much simpler question (due to my misunderstanding of the original question). Ideally I would delete my answer, but I cannot, because it is protected now. | |
| May 25, 2015 at 12:17 | comment | added | salimmath15 | @JosephO'Rourke, only what i have that this conjecture deal with the following simpler system: $$\begin{cases} x_{n+1}=\dfrac{\alpha_{1}}{y_{n}} \\ y_{n+1}=\dfrac{\alpha_{2}}{z_{n}} \\ z_{n+1}=\dfrac{\alpha_{3+}+\beta_{3}x_{n}+\sigma_{3}y_{n}+\lambda_{3}z_{n}}{A_{3}+B_{3}x_{n}+c_{3}y_{n}+D_{3}z_{n}}{}\end{cases} \quad n=0,1,\dots,$$ .with non-negative paramaters and non-negative initial conditions and dominators are never zero | |
| May 25, 2015 at 10:24 | vote | accept | salimmath15 | ||
| May 30, 2015 at 12:52 | |||||
| May 24, 2015 at 22:35 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Despite your lack of interest in initial values, perhaps your conjecture is True for initial values of $1$. | |
| May 24, 2015 at 21:49 | comment | added | salimmath15 | no, i'm not intended any specific initial values | |
| May 24, 2015 at 19:12 | comment | added | Joseph O'Rourke | Perhaps you intended some specific initial values, e.g., $z_0=z_1=z_2=1$...? | |
| May 24, 2015 at 18:15 | history | asked | salimmath15 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |