Skip to main content

Timeline for John Nash's Mathematical Legacy

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

26 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 26, 2016 at 12:35 comment added Takahiro Waki Instantly Nash could calculate that there are 2 accumulation points in distinct sequence of pi.
Jun 1, 2015 at 14:24 history edited kcrisman
added very necessary tag
May 28, 2015 at 23:30 comment added Paul Siegel Disappointingly, the text of the link in the New Yorker article is "his work in algebraic geometry". Sigh... I suppose one of his results at least has implications in real algebraic geometry.
May 28, 2015 at 23:26 answer added Paul Siegel timeline score: 10
May 28, 2015 at 18:08 comment added woliveirajr Link from newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/… points to this question....
S May 27, 2015 at 20:31 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
More international friendly and futureproof date format.
May 27, 2015 at 20:19 review Suggested edits
S May 27, 2015 at 20:31
May 25, 2015 at 21:41 review Suggested edits
May 25, 2015 at 22:18
May 25, 2015 at 21:36 answer added Dima Pasechnik timeline score: 13
May 25, 2015 at 14:50 history edited think_meaning_buildß CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
May 25, 2015 at 11:46 answer added Gil Kalai timeline score: 24
May 25, 2015 at 11:01 comment added Manfred Weis On May 19th John Nash, together with Louis Nirenberg, received the Abel price; I wonder why that hasn't been mentioned so far.
May 25, 2015 at 8:05 comment added Kimball @ToddTrimble Yes, that's a nice interview. Later in the interview, Gromov's also says this nice quote (still talking about Nash): At least, his work in geometry was contrary to what everybody would expect, concerning the results, the techniques, the ideas he used. He did various matters in an extremely simple way, so that everybody could see it but nobody would believe it could work.
May 25, 2015 at 0:33 comment added Suvrit I hope somebody with more expertise chimes up and summarizes Nash's work on cooperative games (I had the fortune to attend a talk by him in 2008 where he carefully described his cooperative games model, he almost expressed a personal relation with each of the variables on his slides)...
May 24, 2015 at 23:15 history edited chaohuang
added "big-list" tag
May 24, 2015 at 22:48 answer added Joseph O'Rourke timeline score: 33
May 24, 2015 at 20:48 comment added Dan Ramras It is interesting to note that there was actually an error in Nash's original proof of the embedding result, as Nash discusses on his webpage: web.math.princeton.edu/jfnj/texts_and_graphics/Main.Content/…
May 24, 2015 at 20:27 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 22
May 24, 2015 at 19:03 answer added Andrew Stout timeline score: 14
May 24, 2015 at 18:26 answer added Igor Khavkine timeline score: 49
May 24, 2015 at 17:13 comment added Todd Trimble I'm wondering if anyone could comment on Nash's work after winning the Nobel Prize? It seems he was trying to do something with logic, but I wasn't able to get the gist of it.
May 24, 2015 at 17:02 answer added Deane Yang timeline score: 62
May 24, 2015 at 16:45 answer added Denis Serre timeline score: 27
May 24, 2015 at 16:36 comment added Todd Trimble That's an impressive quote from Gromov. Elsewhere (ams.org/notices/201003/rtx100300391p.pdf) there is another impressive quote: "Raussen and Skau: This means that you read Nash’s work and were impressed by it very early? Gromov: Yes, I read it very carefully. And I still believe I am the only person who read his papers from the beginning to the end. By judging what people have written about it afterwards, I do not think they have read it." (Hat tip to user5831 here: mathoverflow.net/a/60137/2926)
May 24, 2015 at 16:19 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
May 24, 2015 at 15:58 history asked Paul Siegel CC BY-SA 3.0