Timeline for Different ways of having infinite global dimension
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 22, 2015 at 12:58 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Thanks for your comments. I also think this is maybe a difficult question. Strange examples are... strange. | |
May 22, 2015 at 12:22 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | I think you can find such examples by googling but from what I read it is unknown if there is a ring which is both left and right noetherian whose simple modules all have finite projective dimension but who has infinite global dimension | |
May 22, 2015 at 11:36 | history | edited | Benjamin Steinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
May 22, 2015 at 11:32 | comment | added | Benjamin Steinberg | Let me think. But in any event this shows that if your hypothesis is true then all cyclic modules have finite projective dimension and your direct sum condition doesn't help. So what you really want is an example where each cyclic module has finite projective dimension which is unbounded. | |
May 22, 2015 at 10:47 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | Sorry, your argument convinced me at a first glance, but I don't see the contradiction. There might be a sequence of cyclic modules with finite but divergent projective dimension. | |
May 21, 2015 at 18:14 | history | edited | Benjamin Steinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 274 characters in body
|
May 21, 2015 at 18:08 | vote | accept | Fernando Muro | ||
May 22, 2015 at 10:46 | |||||
May 21, 2015 at 18:07 | history | answered | Benjamin Steinberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |