Timeline for Inverse limit in shape theory
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2015 at 22:21 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | I could write a minimal (brief) exposition of theory of shape for compact spaces and abstract categories in that compact direction. It'd take a separate MO pseudo-answer though. Otherwise, there is my Fund.Math. paper or monograph Shape Theory by J.-M. Cordier and T.Porter. | |
| May 21, 2015 at 14:49 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | As the wiki entry to shape theory is not very expansive, could you state your question in "layman's terms"? | |
| May 21, 2015 at 10:06 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | @FernandoMuro -- right, it'd be more precise. However shape category and shape theory are sometimes used as synonyms (shape theory rolls the tongue smoother, I think). | |
| May 21, 2015 at 9:45 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | You're then talkin about the completeness of a certain category rathen than theory. | |
| May 21, 2015 at 9:21 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | @FernandoMuro -- I have expanded the text of my question to answer yours. | |
| May 21, 2015 at 9:20 | history | edited | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A definition plus a reminder.
|
| May 21, 2015 at 7:51 | comment | added | Fernando Muro | What does 'complete' mean here? | |
| May 21, 2015 at 6:06 | history | edited | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
back to the previous version (I got confused)
|
| May 21, 2015 at 5:50 | history | asked | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | CC BY-SA 3.0 |