Timeline for Will this be a case of self plagiarism or will it annoy the referee? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2015 at 8:52 | history | closed |
Tom Church Benoît Kloeckner David Roberts♦ Dima Pasechnik Alex Degtyarev |
Not suitable for this site | |
| May 21, 2015 at 8:21 | comment | added | Dima Pasechnik | Yet another option is to include the parts with proofs from P1 as an appendix to P2. An appendix is meant to be for referees. As P1 is not yet published, this seems the most appropriate. | |
| May 21, 2015 at 7:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 21, 2015 at 8:52 | |||||
| May 21, 2015 at 7:09 | comment | added | Tom Church | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs on academia.stackexchange.com (and was also asked there: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45754/…) | |
| May 21, 2015 at 5:38 | comment | added | Włodzimierz Holsztyński | Is there any reason or excuse to have this question on MO? | |
| May 21, 2015 at 4:53 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| May 21, 2015 at 3:24 | answer | added | Kimball | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 20, 2015 at 19:58 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @TheMaskedAvenger +10 for the last sentence | |
| May 20, 2015 at 19:34 | comment | added | The Masked Avenger | If I were a referee, I would appreciate having an addendum consisting of a note saying in effect, "I prefer to reference this step, rather than include it", and the five pages justifying the step, so that I the referee don't have to hunt it down. Maybe the referee will help improve on the five pages, or agree with you that the step does not need justifying. If you do a lot to accommodate the referee, the referee might return the favor. | |
| May 20, 2015 at 19:33 | comment | added | Boris Bukh | As a referee, I would prefer a reference. I would appreciate consistent notation between the two papers, and hopefully some mathematical explanation of why two apparently disjoint papers are not disjoint after all. As I referee, I will also want to know why, if the step is "small", does it take 5 pages. | |
| May 20, 2015 at 19:29 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | This might be a better fit in academia.stackexchange? | |
| May 20, 2015 at 19:23 | history | asked | stupidq75 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |