Timeline for Is there a "natural" characterization of when X × βN is normal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 11, 2010 at 20:33 | vote | accept | David R. MacIver | ||
| Apr 11, 2010 at 20:33 | history | bounty ended | David R. MacIver | ||
| Apr 11, 2010 at 19:50 | answer | added | François G. Dorais | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 11, 2010 at 14:23 | history | bounty started | David R. MacIver | ||
| Apr 8, 2010 at 16:31 | comment | added | David R. MacIver | Strange. I see e.g. the title of the linked post about $\omega_1$ working fine as LaTeX. | |
| Apr 8, 2010 at 16:26 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @David: in the past it hasn't for me, but that could be a browser issue | |
| Apr 8, 2010 at 14:39 | comment | added | David R. MacIver | I don't follow. How is that a fix? LaTeX works fine in the titles. | |
| Apr 8, 2010 at 10:30 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | Fixed title to remove LaTeX | |
| Apr 8, 2010 at 10:30 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Apr 8, 2010 at 9:42 | history | asked | David R. MacIver | CC BY-SA 2.5 |