Timeline for Transcendence of products of certain real algebraic numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S May 19, 2015 at 20:15 | history | suggested | Valborg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added emphasis to the argument that the specific form of the product matters greatly by including a comment about the number of representations of reals of this form.
|
| May 19, 2015 at 19:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 19, 2015 at 20:15 | |||||
| May 19, 2015 at 17:20 | comment | added | user13113 | For reference, Merten's first theorem says $\sum_{p\leq n} \ln(p)/p = \ln(n) + E_n$ where $|E_n| \leq 2$. | |
| S May 19, 2015 at 17:16 | history | suggested | Valborg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Needed to respond to comments, but couldn't make a comment myself. Originally I was unregistered, but now I am.
|
| May 19, 2015 at 16:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 19, 2015 at 17:16 | |||||
| May 19, 2015 at 16:47 | review | Late answers | |||
| May 19, 2015 at 17:32 | |||||
| May 19, 2015 at 16:38 | comment | added | Wojowu | Could you elaborate on why you think your first claim is true? I guess that you mean to always choose the least $p_i$ such that adding $p_i^{1/e_i}$ factor will make the product not exceed $r$, but I don't see how it guaranteed the product actually converges to $r$ and not something smaller. | |
| May 19, 2015 at 16:32 | review | First posts | |||
| May 19, 2015 at 17:00 | |||||
| May 19, 2015 at 16:29 | history | answered | Valborg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |