Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 9, 2010 at 19:14 answer added Sun timeline score: 1
Apr 8, 2010 at 18:00 answer added Mike Skirvin timeline score: 5
Apr 8, 2010 at 17:31 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 2.5
edited title
Apr 8, 2010 at 17:28 vote accept Qfwfq
Apr 8, 2010 at 17:19 comment added Qfwfq Edit: should add "semistable".
Apr 8, 2010 at 17:15 comment added Qfwfq Ok. Let's stick to torsion-free sheaves of rank 2 and fixed determinant (in an algebro-geometric/holomorphic setting), if it can help to "restrict" the literature.
Apr 8, 2010 at 17:01 answer added user1504 timeline score: 2
Apr 8, 2010 at 16:55 answer added David Ben-Zvi timeline score: 9
Apr 8, 2010 at 16:43 comment added user1504 I'm aware that you want singular curves. But my point still stands: This is a big subject, and it's not exactly unified. I could probably point you towards something useful, if you gave some indication of what you wanted the moduli space for. But without context, the question is too general.
Apr 8, 2010 at 16:37 comment added Qfwfq I need that the variety over which we consider these structures is a singular (projective) algebraic curve.
Apr 8, 2010 at 16:35 history edited Qfwfq CC BY-SA 2.5
added 391 characters in body; edited title
Apr 8, 2010 at 16:08 comment added user1504 There's an enormous literature on this subject. Torsion-free sheaves, compactified Jacobians, Gieseker bundles, etc. It'd be really helpful if you said more clearly what you were looking for. Are you doing a literature review? Do you need a moduli space with certain properties?
Apr 8, 2010 at 15:36 answer added Jack Evans timeline score: 0
Apr 8, 2010 at 12:26 answer added Zoran Skoda timeline score: 0
Apr 8, 2010 at 8:26 history asked Qfwfq CC BY-SA 2.5