Timeline for Does van der Waerden's Theorem hold for $\omega_1$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2015 at 19:15 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1094 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2015 at 18:42 | comment | added | Wojowu | That seems to work now. You might want to incorporate it into your answer. | |
| May 19, 2015 at 17:56 | comment | added | Wojowu | What if the highest order term appears more than once in $\beta$? I don't think it really works then. | |
| May 18, 2015 at 19:04 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | I'm glad you like it! I was confused terribly by the problem at first, until I had the idea to look at finitary issues with the Cantor normal form. Then I had some complicated versions, but realized that what was making it work was this simple observation. | |
| May 18, 2015 at 18:59 | comment | added | Wojowu | I am amazed by the simplicity of this argument. | |
| May 18, 2015 at 18:42 | vote | accept | Will Brian | ||
| May 18, 2015 at 18:41 | history | edited | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 160 characters in body
|
| May 18, 2015 at 18:27 | history | answered | Joel David Hamkins | CC BY-SA 3.0 |