Timeline for A (likely) positivity property of the Lerch zeta-function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 8, 2015 at 20:31 | comment | added | Suvrit | But looking back, since Sergei's idea resolved the original question, it should be accepted, no? (so that the question attains "answered" status) | |
May 8, 2015 at 18:27 | comment | added | GH from MO | OK, fair enough. I admit I did not read your post carefully. | |
May 8, 2015 at 18:07 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 36 characters in body
|
May 8, 2015 at 18:07 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | GH: Thank you for the comment. My latest post details Sergei's answer (by providing a proof of the identity he cited) and complements it (by the remark about completely monotone functions). So, I don't see why that post belongs with the question rather than with the answers. | |
May 8, 2015 at 16:39 | comment | added | GH from MO | I think your question was not a silly one. On the other hand, your post above is not an answer to your own question (rather, it is a comment), so it should be included in your original post, as part of the question or as a remark following the question. Only answers (or partial answers) should go in the answer fields. | |
May 8, 2015 at 16:26 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | Added a comment concerning an arbitrary completely monotone function in place of $1/(\cdot+c)^{p+1}$. | |
May 8, 2015 at 16:25 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added comment concerning any completely monotone function in place of $1/(\cdot+c)^{p+1}}$.
|
May 8, 2015 at 14:06 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |