Timeline for Infinitesimal deformations of the formal group of $\mathbb{G}_m$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2015 at 15:56 | vote | accept | Lisa S. | ||
May 7, 2015 at 10:53 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | Oh, right. I had read the question too fast. | |
May 7, 2015 at 10:44 | comment | added | grghxy | @LaurentMoret-Bailly: All I meant is that since the given data is an ordinary smooth group $G$ and there is a stronger conclusion valid even for $G$ itself (as explained in my answer), the core result can be formulated and proved without reference to formal groups. | |
May 7, 2015 at 6:03 | comment | added | Laurent Moret-Bailly | "The intervention of formal groups is a red herring": why is that? The question is about formal groups. | |
May 7, 2015 at 4:06 | history | answered | grghxy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |