Timeline for Why we study Geometric invariant theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 3, 2015 at 19:48 | history | edited | user9072 |
added tag
|
|
May 3, 2015 at 18:11 | answer | added | coudy | timeline score: 19 | |
May 3, 2015 at 16:59 | comment | added | David Benjamin Lim | One reason for studying GIT would be the construction of quotients (and hence of various types of moduli spaces). Mumford showed that if $X \subseteq \Bbb{P}(V)$ is a projective variety with $V$ a linear representation of a linearly reductive group $G$, such that $G$ acts on $X$ via restriction, then a good quotient of the semistable locus $X^{ss}$ exists. This idea was used by Mumford, Gieseker, etc to prove that a coarse moduli space $M_g$ exists. Nowadays, there are more fancy methods to prove this coarse moduli space exists, such as the Keel-Mori Theorem. | |
May 3, 2015 at 16:19 | review | Close votes | |||
May 3, 2015 at 19:48 | |||||
May 3, 2015 at 16:10 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Would "it is interesting and rich" count as a "reason for studying GIT"? (I think that if this question stays open then it would be helpful to have a better idea of the kind of answer you want.) | |
May 3, 2015 at 15:59 | review | First posts | |||
May 3, 2015 at 16:01 | |||||
May 3, 2015 at 15:57 | history | asked | riu_ss | CC BY-SA 3.0 |