Skip to main content

Timeline for Positive roots of a polynomial

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 4, 2015 at 12:59 vote accept dima
May 4, 2015 at 12:30 answer added Max Alekseyev timeline score: 21
May 4, 2015 at 4:25 comment added Suvrit For $n=3$ and also for $n=4$ it seems there is just one change of sign in the consecutive terms, so Descartes' rule of signs should kick in and yield at most one positive root. Perhaps one can even inductively show that there is just one change of sign, and a small additional argument shows that there is at least one positive root.
May 3, 2015 at 20:07 comment added Douglas Zare If you divide by $\prod (x+a_k)^2$, you can replace the product with the reciprocal of the omitted term, $(x+a_i)^{-2}$.
May 3, 2015 at 19:51 comment added dima @Greg Martin: $n=1$ does not satisfy the condition that not all $a_i$'s are equal. For $n=2$ we get $p(x)=\frac{1}{2} \left(a_1-a_2\right){}^2 x^2-\frac{1}{2} a_1 \left(a_1-a_2\right){}^2 a_2$ and so clearly the only positive root is $x_0=\sqrt{a_1 a_2}$. For $n=3$ I don't know already...
May 3, 2015 at 19:21 comment added Greg Martin Can you prove it for $n=1$, $n=2$, $n=3$?
May 3, 2015 at 9:00 history edited dima CC BY-SA 3.0
added 55 characters in body
May 3, 2015 at 8:59 comment added dima @Seva some numerical evidence, I'll add this to the question
May 3, 2015 at 8:58 comment added Seva What makes you tho expect that it has exactly one positive root?
May 3, 2015 at 8:23 history asked dima CC BY-SA 3.0