Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
May 4, 2015 at 22:11 comment added Asaf Karagila I noticed a minor mistake in the answer; it is possible that $\operatorname{Card}(X)^2\nleq \operatorname{Card}(2^X)$; but it's always provable that if $X$ has more than four elements, then $\operatorname{Card}(2^X)\nleq\operatorname{Card}(X)^2$. We only need the one direction, as I point out in that Math.SE answer; so the second one has no business being here.
May 4, 2015 at 22:09 history edited Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0
It is possible that X^2\nleq 2^X, so I had to correct that.
May 1, 2015 at 19:39 comment added Asaf Karagila Tell me about it! :-)
May 1, 2015 at 19:38 comment added Garabed Gulbenkian You are right. I was finally able to digest all the steps of your proof. Proving theorems about all infinite cardinal numbers can be quite tricky when the Axiom of Choice is not available.
Apr 30, 2015 at 21:40 comment added Asaf Karagila Does the last paragraph uses anywhere that the set is Dedekind finite? Only that it has five different elements.
Apr 30, 2015 at 19:09 comment added Garabed Gulbenkian In ZF set theory without the Axiom of Choice, there exist infinite sets X which are neither Alephs nor Dedekind-finite. Is it still true for such sets that CARD(2^X) is greater than 2*CARD(X)?
Apr 29, 2015 at 20:52 comment added Garabed Gulbenkian Thanks for the neat proof-in ZF without the Axiom of Choice-that CARD(X(I)) is greater than CARD(X) when X is infinite.
Apr 29, 2015 at 20:37 vote accept Garabed Gulbenkian
Apr 28, 2015 at 19:16 history answered Asaf Karagila CC BY-SA 3.0