Timeline for Best Hölder exponents of surjective maps from the unit square to the unit cube
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2022 at 13:57 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question was bumped anyway)
|
| Jan 8, 2016 at 19:47 | history | edited | Pietro Majer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor edit
|
| Jan 8, 2016 at 10:25 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Yes, the only theorem in that paper that deals with Hoelder maps is Thm 2.1, but has nothing or very little to see with the present problem. | |
| Apr 29, 2015 at 15:59 | comment | added | jwg | I can believe that it might follow from the main theorem of that paper, but I don't see that it follows immediately! I am a bit rusty - maybe I am missing a well-known fact about maps between cubes in $\mathbb{R}^n$? The theorem in the paper does not talk about surjective maps - although in the case of maps to the interval, surjectivity is obvious, I can imagine that this need not be the case in higher dimensions. Can you provide more details of why that theorem implies your claim? | |
| Apr 27, 2015 at 14:09 | history | edited | user71045 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 421 characters in body
|
| Apr 27, 2015 at 12:45 | comment | added | user71045 | The question has a typo. It is always easier to get maps with smaller Hölder exponent. | |
| Apr 27, 2015 at 12:28 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 27, 2015 at 12:32 | |||||
| Apr 27, 2015 at 12:25 | history | answered | user71045 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |