Skip to main content

Timeline for An unfair marriage lemma

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 14, 2023 at 0:01 comment added darij grinberg At least it is not gender-biased :)
May 12, 2023 at 7:35 comment added Roland Bacher This question is unfair and politically incorrect! I like it very much nevertheless!
Aug 3, 2015 at 10:56 comment added darij grinberg Other discussions on this question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1268005/… and math.stackexchange.com/questions/1188829/…
Jun 24, 2015 at 13:54 comment added Sergei Ivanov @Dominic van der Zypen: Yes we have just finished it. It is on arxiv.org/abs/1506.06781
Jun 23, 2015 at 9:53 comment added Dominic van der Zypen Great question (and answer!). Have you already uploaded your article? I would be interested in seeing it!
Apr 24, 2015 at 1:12 vote accept Sergei Ivanov
Apr 24, 2015 at 0:38 comment added darij grinberg Notice that your lemma generalizes Hall's theorem (just declare all boys to be 1st class and all girls to be 2nd class).
Apr 23, 2015 at 23:26 answer added bof timeline score: 22
Apr 23, 2015 at 21:08 answer added Flo Pfender timeline score: 12
Apr 23, 2015 at 20:14 comment added Sergei Ivanov @darij: Yes, of course we will prove it in the paper if there is no reference. It just looks too natural to be unknown.
Apr 23, 2015 at 19:52 history edited Sergei Ivanov CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed language
Apr 23, 2015 at 19:29 comment added darij grinberg It's a really nice theorem and you should write down your proof. Should it go into your paper on geometric analysis? I don't know, but I wouldn't see a reason why not.
Apr 23, 2015 at 18:14 history asked Sergei Ivanov CC BY-SA 3.0