Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 26, 2015 at 14:56 history edited Mario CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:25 history edited Mario CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08 vote accept Mario
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08 vote accept Mario
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:02 review Reopen votes
Apr 24, 2015 at 16:13
Apr 24, 2015 at 9:41 history edited Mario CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 118 characters in body
Apr 24, 2015 at 6:15 history closed Benoît Kloeckner
Joonas Ilmavirta
coudy
Stefan Kohl
Neil Strickland
Needs details or clarity
Apr 23, 2015 at 19:02 review Close votes
Apr 24, 2015 at 6:15
Apr 23, 2015 at 18:45 answer added Otis Chodosh timeline score: 6
Apr 23, 2015 at 17:14 comment added Mario Maybe a better question could be if there is a way to deform minimal surfaces (mean curvature equals zero) to obtain at the limit that list of minimal cones. Maybe by only looking at the Weierstrass-Enneper representation it shouldn't be so difficult to produce examples of minimal surfaces that deforms into those cones, I wonder if someone has already done that or if this is totally wrong.
Apr 23, 2015 at 15:50 comment added Benoît Kloeckner Your question is unclear: are you talking about minimal surfaces (which are smooth, as you say) or soap films? In the later case, there are several possible definitions, but my understanding of Jean Taylor's work is precisely that the minimal cones she classified are the infinitesimal models for soap films. Either way, it looks like you answered your own question, but I may have overlooked something.
Apr 23, 2015 at 15:15 history asked Mario CC BY-SA 3.0