Timeline for Singularities in minimal surfaces [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 26, 2015 at 14:56 | history | edited | Mario | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:25 | history | edited | Mario | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08 | vote | accept | Mario | ||
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08 | vote | accept | Mario | ||
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:08 | |||||
Apr 24, 2015 at 10:02 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Apr 24, 2015 at 16:13 | |||||
Apr 24, 2015 at 9:41 | history | edited | Mario | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 118 characters in body
|
Apr 24, 2015 at 6:15 | history | closed |
Benoît Kloeckner Joonas Ilmavirta coudy Stefan Kohl♦ Neil Strickland |
Needs details or clarity | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 19:02 | review | Close votes | |||
Apr 24, 2015 at 6:15 | |||||
Apr 23, 2015 at 18:45 | answer | added | Otis Chodosh | timeline score: 6 | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 17:14 | comment | added | Mario | Maybe a better question could be if there is a way to deform minimal surfaces (mean curvature equals zero) to obtain at the limit that list of minimal cones. Maybe by only looking at the Weierstrass-Enneper representation it shouldn't be so difficult to produce examples of minimal surfaces that deforms into those cones, I wonder if someone has already done that or if this is totally wrong. | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 15:50 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | Your question is unclear: are you talking about minimal surfaces (which are smooth, as you say) or soap films? In the later case, there are several possible definitions, but my understanding of Jean Taylor's work is precisely that the minimal cones she classified are the infinitesimal models for soap films. Either way, it looks like you answered your own question, but I may have overlooked something. | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 15:15 | history | asked | Mario | CC BY-SA 3.0 |