Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 22, 2022 at 17:25 comment added Christian Remling @SMS: No, for an analogous criterion for $x\notin\sigma (A+B)$, you would need $E$ to be zero on a neighborhood of $\{ (s,t): s+t=x\}$.
Aug 22, 2022 at 17:13 comment added SMS So then, we should also have $x + y \notin \sigma(A + B)$ if and only if $E(M) = 0$ for some set of the form $M = (x - \delta_1, x + \delta_1) \times (y - \delta_2, y + \delta_2)$. Do I understand this correctly? Thanks!
Aug 22, 2022 at 13:50 comment added Christian Remling @SMS: I think there's a similar description here: $x\notin\sigma (A)$ if and only if $E(M)=0$ for some set of the form $M=(x-\delta,x+\delta)\times\mathbb R$.
Aug 21, 2022 at 20:32 comment added SMS @ChristianRemling Is there any way to read the spectra of $A$ and $B$ from these two variable projection valued measures? In the single variable case, we know that Spec$(A) = $ supp$ E_\lambda$, where $A = \int \lambda dE_\lambda$.
Apr 16, 2015 at 6:48 comment added ifw @amano $ikX$ is relatively $\Delta$ compact, in particular, it is relatively $\Delta$ bounded with relative bound $0$. Then see my answer below.
Apr 16, 2015 at 0:09 vote accept amano
Apr 15, 2015 at 19:03 comment added Christian Remling @amano: This definitely works because you can use the Fourier transform to (simultaneously) make multiplication operators out of both of them. (So you in fact don't need any general theory to make $A+B$ self-adjoint on a suitable domain.)
Apr 15, 2015 at 18:56 comment added amano Very nice answer! Suppose we take the following example: $A = \Delta$, the Laplacian on the torus, and $B = ik\frac{\partial}{\partial x_1}$, where $k \in \mathbb{R}$. Clearly they commute. But I am not sure whether they strongly commute in the sense you describe. Could you please shed a little light on this point? Thanks!
Apr 15, 2015 at 18:39 history answered Christian Remling CC BY-SA 3.0