Timeline for Vanishing in etale motivic cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2015 at 15:24 | comment | added | Amit H | The correct analogue of 1) would be $H^{p,q}(X,{\mathbb Z})=0$ when $p>q+cd(X)+1$ where $cd(X)$ is the etale cohomological dimension of $X$ (in the Nisnevich case, this agrees with dim(X)) and the +1 has to do with the fact that the sheaves may not be torsion. | |
| Apr 15, 2015 at 8:29 | vote | accept | Carlos | ||
| Apr 14, 2015 at 14:42 | history | answered | Matthias Wendt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |