Skip to main content

Timeline for Understanding Faltings's Theorem

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 16, 2015 at 17:53 vote accept pjox
Apr 13, 2015 at 17:44 comment added pjox I'm well aware of Vojta's proof, and honestly I do want to study it as well, but I wanted to understand Faltings's proof first. I know that might be an odd decision, but the reason I want to do it that way is that I'm as interested in all the prerequisites as I'm interested in the theorem itself. Now, this approach might be mistaken; I'm not sure, that's why I'm asking for advice. But I'm sure I want to understand both proofs, that is my longer-term project. I don't know why, but I'm simply amazed and intrigued by this theorem! Thank you so much for you answer!
S Apr 13, 2015 at 17:08 history suggested Michael Joyce CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected the title of Hindry and Silverman's text, in case the OP wants to consult it
Apr 13, 2015 at 17:03 review Suggested edits
S Apr 13, 2015 at 17:08
Apr 13, 2015 at 13:25 history answered Joe Silverman CC BY-SA 3.0