Timeline for About localization theorem for affine Lie algebra?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2010 at 7:03 | vote | accept | JJH | ||
| Jun 12, 2010 at 22:07 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 12, 2010 at 9:50 | history | edited | JJH | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 31 characters in body; added 36 characters in body
|
| Jun 12, 2010 at 9:38 | comment | added | JJH | I don't know how to formulate the locallization theorem, that's because I don't know how to define the global section functor, that's exactly my question!! In the second paragraph, I explained the difficulty why I can not define it. It seems you haven't understood my question. | |
| Jun 12, 2010 at 8:53 | comment | added | Victor Protsak | Let me get this straight: are you expecting others to explain you how to think of something that you cannot even formulate? What is the precise question? | |
| Jun 11, 2010 at 22:30 | history | edited | JJH | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Add concrete question
|
| Apr 4, 2010 at 2:03 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | You would do quite a service to include in your question at least a statement of the terms used. | |
| Apr 3, 2010 at 23:36 | comment | added | Shizhuo Zhang | I was told by one student of Bernstein that even for affine Lie algebra(critical level), this localization type theorem is still not completed. For non-critical level, Kashiwara's definition of flag variety of Kac-Moody algebra is not well accepted(in some sense) and I did not know any work in this setting. | |
| Apr 3, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Critical level: arxiv.org/abs/0712.0788 | |
| Apr 3, 2010 at 21:40 | history | asked | JJH | CC BY-SA 2.5 |