Timeline for Diameter of sum-graph over a non-meager set
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2015 at 13:50 | history | edited | Ben Barber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
can't be sure that we stay inside N
|
| Apr 8, 2015 at 11:52 | comment | added | Ben Barber | @IlyaBogdanov, you're quite right. I don't think this is serious, because we can restrict attention to just the large elements of $S$ without harming the density, and we still get one $m$ that works for all final segments of $S$ (see Lemma 6 of arxiv.org/abs/1308.0488). I'll have a look: hopefully the details won't be too messy. | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 11:37 | comment | added | Ilya Bogdanov | In the first claim, a number $z$ may happen to be negative... | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 11:03 | vote | accept | Dominic van der Zypen | ||
| Apr 8, 2015 at 10:50 | history | answered | Ben Barber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |