Skip to main content
MathOverflow

Return to Answer

dead MIT link is dead
Source Link
darij grinberg
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253

My conjecture was correct. This, and more, is now proven in The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft)The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft) (not yet a paper, but probably soon to be posted in more or less this form on theaka arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01201).

(Some questions do remain, such as Todo 9.5those in §9.)

My conjecture was correct. This, and more, is now proven in The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft) (not yet a paper, but probably soon to be posted in more or less this form on the arXiv).

(Some questions do remain, such as Todo 9.5.)

My conjecture was correct. This, and more, is now proven in The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft) (aka arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.01201).

(Some questions do remain, such as those in §9.)

Source Link
darij grinberg
darij grinberg
  • 33.8k
  • 4
  • 118
  • 253

My conjecture was correct. This, and more, is now proven in The signed random-to-top operator on tensor space (draft) (not yet a paper, but probably soon to be posted in more or less this form on the arXiv).

(Some questions do remain, such as Todo 9.5.)