Timeline for Norm of a matrix operator with a special structure
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 at 14:22 | answer | added | loup blanc | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 15:11 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | @Suvrit: it is hard to read "tone" from printed text ... it always surprises me when people can't tell I'm being sarcastic, for example | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 14:42 | history | edited | Twi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A comment on bondedness added.
|
| Apr 8, 2015 at 13:28 | comment | added | Suvrit | @NikWeaver: my question was a rhetoric question :-) sorry, I should have just asked it more directly (because it is the lack of that positivity that breaks this question). | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 10:07 | history | edited | Twi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A false assertion deleted.
|
| Apr 8, 2015 at 10:06 | comment | added | Twi | @Nik Weaver You are right. The remark is wrong. I edit it. | |
| Apr 8, 2015 at 1:09 | comment | added | Nik Weaver | @Suvrit: it's not positive because it's not self-adjoint. | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 22:11 | comment | added | Suvrit | Why is $C$ positive? | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 21:01 | answer | added | Miel Sharf | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 16:18 | history | asked | Twi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |