Timeline for Terminology: Algebras where long strings of products are 0?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2022 at 11:02 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken link fixed
|
| Apr 2, 2010 at 21:52 | comment | added | Manny Reyes | Yes, to confirm, the PlanetMath terminology is standard, while the MathWorld terminology is bad. | |
| Apr 2, 2010 at 20:57 | comment | added | David Jordan | Right, sorry. I read that you said you had a uniform bound, but then forgot it. =] | |
| Apr 2, 2010 at 19:58 | vote | accept | Dylan Thurston | ||
| Apr 2, 2010 at 19:09 | comment | added | Dylan Thurston | That's good, thanks, although it's a mouthful. The added "locally" condition is not what I asked for. I'd just like to confirm that PlanetMath is contradicting MathWorld on what a nilpotent ring is, and that PlanetMath is right? | |
| Apr 2, 2010 at 19:06 | vote | accept | Dylan Thurston | ||
| Apr 2, 2010 at 19:07 | |||||
| Apr 2, 2010 at 18:44 | history | answered | David Jordan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |