Timeline for Universal coefficient theorem for group homology and cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Apr 3, 2015 at 15:22 | comment | added | user44191 | Say we were working over a field; would knowing $H_.(G, W)$ for each simple representation $W$ be enough? Each indecomposable? | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 16:02 | comment | added | user44191 | That was part of my line of thinking; is there any data that could lead to a form of a UCT? | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 8:47 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | The basic problem with asking for a UCT for a nontrivial action is: what data is it supposed to depend on? It certainly shouldn't depend only on $H_{\bullet}(G, \mathbb{Z})$ and on the underlying abelian group of $M$, for example. | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 6:11 | vote | accept | user44191 | ||
| Apr 1, 2015 at 5:48 | answer | added | Chris Gerig | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 1, 2015 at 4:49 | vote | accept | user44191 | ||
| Apr 1, 2015 at 6:11 | |||||
| Mar 31, 2015 at 22:00 | answer | added | Andy Putman | timeline score: 15 | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 21:51 | history | asked | user44191 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |