Timeline for A strange condition on containment of special complex numbers in cyclotomic fields
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 1, 2015 at 19:19 | answer | added | Sent from my iphone | timeline score: -1 | |
S Mar 30, 2015 at 19:02 | history | suggested | Robert A. Neiss | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Restrict $a$ to roots of unity.
|
Mar 30, 2015 at 18:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 30, 2015 at 19:02 | |||||
S Mar 30, 2015 at 18:46 | history | suggested | Robert A. Neiss | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Restrict $a$ to roots of unity.
|
Mar 30, 2015 at 18:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 30, 2015 at 18:46 | |||||
Mar 30, 2015 at 15:32 | comment | added | David Loeffler | (PS: I suspect this isn't an answer to the question you meant to ask, so can you refine the question to rule out such silliness?) | |
Mar 30, 2015 at 15:30 | comment | added | David Loeffler | You want this to be impossible for $a \in \mathbf{C}^*$ and $|a| < 1/4$, with no other conditions on $a$? Then you're out of luck. Let $\rho$ be a rational number a tiny little bit bigger than 1/2 (but smaller than $\sqrt{1/4 + 1/4^m}$). Then there's a unique real algebraic number $a \in (0, 1/4)$ such that $\sqrt{1/4 + a^m} = \rho$, and for this $a$ the condition that $\sqrt{1/4 + a^m} \in \mathbf{Q}(\zeta_m, a)$ is vacuously satisfied because $\rho \in \mathbf{Q}$. | |
Mar 30, 2015 at 14:00 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 30, 2015 at 14:03 | |||||
Mar 30, 2015 at 13:59 | history | asked | Robert A. Neiss | CC BY-SA 3.0 |