Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 6, 2023 at 15:23 history edited Gerry Myerson
edited tags
Jan 6, 2023 at 8:15 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
added a Wayback Machine link for the dead link
Dec 20, 2022 at 17:19 answer added Zvonimir Sikic timeline score: 4
Nov 27, 2021 at 6:46 comment added kushal Here's a nice argument: Let the length of the pieces be x, y, and 1-x-y. To form a triangle, each of x,y, and 1-x-y must be less than 1/2. A triangle is not formed iff the two cuts are on the same side of a midpoint. The probability that a given cut is on right side of the midpoint is 1/2, so the probability that both cuts are on the right side is simply 1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4. Imagine the two cuts as three cuts on a circle, where one of the cuts is to straighten it out. All three pieces have 1/4 probability of being longer than half. Hence, probability of triangle formation is: 1 - 3*1/4 = 1/4.
Jul 14, 2016 at 20:25 answer added Bill the Lizard timeline score: 6
Feb 10, 2016 at 12:32 comment added Ryan Oberoi so here is the simple solution - divide a line into 6 parts of length 1/6 each. without loss of generality, the largest broken part will be greater than or equal to 1/3. So the largest part can lie in segments 3,4,5 or 6. Only 1 of these 4 portions will result in a triangle (since segments 4,5,6 will result in largest part being > 1/2). Ergo, 1/4 probability.
Dec 30, 2015 at 20:36 comment added aioobe This problem was presented to me a couple of days ago. I just wrote a little blog post explaining my solution, which ends with a symmetry argument.
Aug 27, 2013 at 11:45 review Close votes
Aug 27, 2013 at 14:13
Aug 27, 2013 at 11:24 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
replaced deprecated tag 'geometry'; shortened title because software complained that title was longer than 150 characters
Aug 27, 2013 at 11:10 history protected Kim Morrison
Aug 27, 2013 at 10:56 answer added Arash timeline score: 6
Aug 27, 2013 at 10:52 answer added Arash timeline score: 4
Mar 22, 2013 at 18:21 answer added Shaswata timeline score: 4
Nov 2, 2011 at 16:10 comment added Michael Lugo This seems to be related to a recent math.stackexchange question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/72977/…
Jun 4, 2011 at 14:26 answer added Allen Hatcher timeline score: 8
Jun 4, 2011 at 13:00 answer added Christian Blatter timeline score: 53
Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 answer added Peter Shor timeline score: 66
Jun 3, 2011 at 0:12 answer added Mort Schwartz timeline score: -1
Jun 25, 2010 at 19:34 answer added Michael Lugo timeline score: 10
Oct 23, 2009 at 17:49 vote accept Michael Lugo
Oct 23, 2009 at 3:57 answer added Ilya Nikokoshev timeline score: 12
Oct 23, 2009 at 2:59 answer added Jason Dyer timeline score: 21
Oct 23, 2009 at 2:43 answer added Kevin P. Costello timeline score: 123
Oct 23, 2009 at 2:28 history asked Michael Lugo CC BY-SA 2.5