Timeline for Injecting premises into two implicational premises connected by a tensor (multiplicative conjunction) in linear logic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 26, 2015 at 20:31 | history | suggested | Ed Dean |
added [lo.logic] tag
|
|
| Mar 26, 2015 at 20:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 26, 2015 at 20:31 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2015 at 20:07 | comment | added | Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine | Presentations of linear logic vary a bit; can you give a reference for what you are using? A rough answer: your approach sounds correct to me. It is not possible to get either one of $(A \multimap B)$ or $(C \multimap D)$ individually, but (in the presentations I know) inverting the tensor gives you the two of them together as formulas on the left of the $\vdash$, and you can then apply them to premises (1) and (2) as you describe. Some presentations may present this slightly differently, but something like this should always work. | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 19:50 | answer | added | Todd Trimble | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 19:29 | history | edited | Zerkezhi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 26, 2015 at 19:07 | history | edited | Zerkezhi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 26, 2015 at 19:00 | history | asked | Zerkezhi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |