Timeline for The closure-complement-intersection problem
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27 at 14:18 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| S Feb 27 at 14:02 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed broken link to Wikipedia
|
| Feb 27 at 13:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 27 at 14:02 | |||||
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 1, 2017 at 9:09 | comment | added | Taras Banakh | @GregMuller There is a good site (mathtransit.com/cornucopia.php) devoted to the Kuratowski Closure-Complement Theorem. | |
| Apr 5, 2010 at 18:24 | answer | added | mathematrucker | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 15:33 | vote | accept | Greg Muller | ||
| Apr 1, 2010 at 4:32 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | (Greg, now that I think about it I think Mike O'Connor had a sharper proof of this.) | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 3:44 | answer | added | François G. Dorais | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 2:05 | comment | added | Greg Muller | Quite alright. As you indirectly pointed out, the restriction of this problem to any two of the three operators is a very easy problem. However, showing that the addition of the third 'doesn't add too much' seems harder. | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 2:01 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Greg, I misread your question and had posted an irrelevant answer, which is now deleted. Sorry! | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 1:46 | answer | added | Joel David Hamkins | timeline score: 13 | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 1:39 | history | asked | Greg Muller | CC BY-SA 2.5 |