Timeline for Decidability of the Hilbert lattice and quantum logic
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 26, 2018 at 13:27 | vote | accept | Iian Smythe | ||
Mar 26, 2018 at 2:50 | history | edited | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Mar 25, 2018 at 19:35 | answer | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | timeline score: 7 | |
Mar 18, 2015 at 18:52 | comment | added | Iian Smythe | I think, as in that paper, "quantum logic" is usually used to refer to the equational/quantifier-free theory. It just happens that I am interested in the question about the first-order theory (from which the corresponding fact about the equational theory would follow, of course). A negative result about the first-order theory would be interesting to me, for independent reasons (undecidability of lattices makes me think of the Turing degrees). | |
Mar 18, 2015 at 18:19 | comment | added | anemone | Isn't the logic just the equational theory of the lattice? (It would so appear from the linked paper. They do appeal to its first order theory for the decidability proof, but that's generally an overkill by a couple of orders of magnitude, so to speak.) | |
Mar 18, 2015 at 15:09 | history | edited | Iian Smythe |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 17, 2015 at 15:19 | history | asked | Iian Smythe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |